[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13810618#comment-13810618
]
Thomas Neidhart commented on MATH-1045:
---------------------------------------
This is an artifact from the original Jama source code.
There was a similar code construct, which has been removed when the code has
been translated, but this one remained. Imho it is safe to remove this part
also.
While checking this I have seen there was a new release of Jama last November
with a bugfix for possible infinite loops. Need to check if our code is also
affected, but most likely.
> EigenDecomposition.Solver should consider tiny values 0 for purposes of
> determining singularity
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MATH-1045
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1045
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.2
> Reporter: Sean Owen
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: eigenvalue, singular
> Fix For: 3.3
>
> Attachments: MATH-1045.patch, MATH-1045.patch, MATH-1045_2.patch
>
>
> EigenDecomposition.Solver tests for singularity by comparing eigenvalues to 0
> for exact equality. Elsewhere in the class and in the code, of course, very
> small values are considered 0. This causes the solver to consider some
> singular matrices as non-singular.
> The patch here includes a test as well showing the behavior -- the matrix is
> clearly singular but isn't considered as such since one eigenvalue are ~1e-14
> rather than exactly 0.
> (What I am not sure of is whether we should really be evaluating the *norm*
> of the imaginary eigenvalues rather than real/imag components separately. But
> the javadoc says the solver only supports real eigenvalues anyhow, so it's
> kind of moot since imag=0 for all eigenvalues.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
