[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13860077#comment-13860077
]
Lukasz Lenart commented on OGNL-189:
------------------------------------
But implementation of that interface aren't interchangeable - I think you mean
{{CacheFactory}} where there are three different implementations and right now
{{HashMapCacheFactory}} is hardcoded into {{OgnlCache}} - is that correct?
http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-ognl/apidocs/index.html?org/apache/commons/ognl/internal/CacheFactory.html
> Allow user to choose his preferred cache implementation
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OGNL-189
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-189
> Project: Commons OGNL
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Maurizio Cucchiara
> Assignee: Maurizio Cucchiara
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> At the moment, OGNL provides 4 different kind of cache implementation.
> After some performance tests I realized that there is no the best approach:
> the efficiency depending strongly on the use of the cache itself.
> Hence give the freedom of choice should be a good thing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
