[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14048261#comment-14048261
 ] 

Derek Scherger commented on MATH-1134:
--------------------------------------

Wow, that was fast. At a glance the new code looks good, it will certainly fix 
the race I found earlier today.
The only downside to initializing everything in the constructor is that you pay 
that cost up front, and if you weren't going to use the partial derivatives 
that's wasted. Not sure if that's a big deal or not.


> unsafe initialization in BicubicSplineInterpolatingFunction
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-1134
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1134
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.3
>            Reporter: Derek Scherger
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The lazy initialization of the internal array of partialDerivatives in 
> BicubicSplineInterpolatingFunction is not thread safe. If multiple threads 
> call any of the partialDerivative functions concurrently one thread may start 
> the initialization and others will see the array is non-null and assume it is 
> fully initialized. If the internal array of partial derivatives was 
> initialized in the constructor this would not be a problem.
> i.e. the following check in partialDerivative(which, x, y)
>         if (partialDerivatives == null) {
>             computePartialDerivatives();
>         }
> will start the initialization. However in computePartialDerivatives()
>         partialDerivatives = new BivariateFunction[5][lastI][lastJ];
> makes it appear to other threads as the the initialization has completed when 
> it may not have.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to