[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15003932#comment-15003932
]
Karsten Klein commented on COLLECTIONS-580:
-------------------------------------------
Not sure I fully understand. The critical piece of code is always executed on a
fully deserialized object. So the approach should work (or I apologize for not
having understood the subject matter).
However, awareness is required on how people have to deal with this finding.
The lib is very wide-spread. Thus a minimum behavior change in the software
stack is preferred.
For newer versions (major/minor) I would agree to your fail-fast approach.
> Arbitrary remote code execution with InvokerTransformer
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COLLECTIONS-580
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-580
> Project: Commons Collections
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0, 4.0
> Reporter: Philippe Marschall
> Attachments: COLLECTIONS-580.patch
>
>
> With {{InvokerTransformer}} serializable collections can be build that
> execute arbitrary Java code.
> {{sun.reflect.annotation.AnnotationInvocationHandler#readObject}} invokes
> {{#entrySet}} and {{#get}} on a deserialized collection. If you have an
> endpoint that accepts serialized Java objects (JMX, RMI, remote EJB, ...) you
> can combine the two to create arbitrary remote code execution vulnerability.
> I don't know of a good fix short of removing {{InvokerTransformer}} or making
> it not Serializable. Both probably break existing applications.
> This is not my research, but has been discovered by other people.
> https://github.com/frohoff/ysoserial
> http://foxglovesecurity.com/2015/11/06/what-do-weblogic-websphere-jboss-jenkins-opennms-and-your-application-have-in-common-this-vulnerability/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
