[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Eric Barnhill updated MATH-1291:
--------------------------------
    Description: I have adopted nomenclature such as complex2Real and 
interleavedFloat2Complex in my proposed patch for ComplexUtils. There is 
already a method present called convertToComplex which I propose elsewhere to 
changing to real2Complex to conform to this new nomenclature. This method is 
called by LaguerreSolver, so I propose a patch to LaguerreSolver so that the 
code is not broken by this change to ComplexUtils.  (was: I have adopted 
nomenclature such as complex2Real and interleavedFloat2Complex in my proposed 
patch for ComplexUtils. There is already a method present called polarToComplex 
which I propose elsewhere to changing to polar2Complex to conform to this new 
nomenclature. This method is called by LaguerreSolver, so I propose a patch to 
LaguerreSolver so that the code is not broken by this change to ComplexUtils.)

> Alteration of LaguerreSolver to adapt to new ComplexUtils nomenclature
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-1291
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1291
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.5
>            Reporter: Eric Barnhill
>            Priority: Trivial
>              Labels: newbie, patch
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> I have adopted nomenclature such as complex2Real and interleavedFloat2Complex 
> in my proposed patch for ComplexUtils. There is already a method present 
> called convertToComplex which I propose elsewhere to changing to real2Complex 
> to conform to this new nomenclature. This method is called by LaguerreSolver, 
> so I propose a patch to LaguerreSolver so that the code is not broken by this 
> change to ComplexUtils.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to