[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15091184#comment-15091184
 ] 

Thomas Neidhart commented on MATH-1315:
---------------------------------------

Indeed, you are right this has to be fixed.

> MultiKMeansPlusPlusClusterer buggy for alternative evaluators
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-1315
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1315
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.5
>            Reporter: Thorsten Schäfer
>
> I just looked into the source code for the MultiKMeansPlusPlusClusterer and 
> realized that it would return null in case of an alternative evaluator that 
> favors bigger values instead of smaller ones:
> The basic idea of the clustering method is that we perform n clusterings and 
> choose the best result. The decision what's the best result is performed by 
> the evaluator, which by default assumes smaller values are better. 
> According to the documentation, we can also provide a different evaluator, 
> which for instance would decide that bigger values are better, but given we 
> initialize the best value with Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY in method 
> MultiKMeansPlusPlusClusterer.cluster(Collection<T>), we would never find a 
> "better" result and thus always return null. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to