[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15793695#comment-15793695
]
Gilles commented on MATH-1397:
------------------------------
Hello Mario and Raymond.
Having complex numbers (and related functionality) in their own component was
on the roadmap; an effort led by Eric Barnhill (to whom I've just assigned this
issue).
If you'd like to help move the code out of Commons Math, please post to the
"dev" ML.
Thanks for the report.
> Complex.ZERO.pow(2.0) is NaN
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: MATH-1397
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1397
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.6.1
> Environment: Linux, Java1.7/Java1.8
> Reporter: Mario Wenzel
> Assignee: Eric Barnhill
> Priority: Minor
>
> ```
> package complextest;
> import org.apache.commons.math3.complex.Complex;
> public class T {
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> System.out.println(Complex.ZERO.pow(2.0));
> }
> }
> ```
> This is the code and the readout is `(NaN, NaN)`. This surely isn't right.
> For one, it should actually be zero
> (https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(0%2B0i)%5E2) and second of all, the
> documentation doesn't state that anything could go wrong from a Complex
> number that has no NaNs and Infs.
> The other definition states that it doesn't work when the base is Zero, but
> it surely should. This strange corner case destroys any naive implementation
> of stuff wrt the mandelbrot set.
> It would be nice to not have to implement this exception myself.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
