[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16034302#comment-16034302
 ] 

Stefan Bodewig commented on COMPRESS-400:
-----------------------------------------

Sounds like a good idea.

We could try to prevent people from setting headers that might be set by our 
output stream itself (path, linkpath, size, gid, mtime, uid, mode, 
SCHILY.devmajor and SCHILY.devminor as of 1.14) but I'm not sure this is worth 
the effort. If people really want to set those values themselves, they should 
get what they want IMHO.

> It should be possible for users to create and access extra PAX headers to tar 
> archives 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COMPRESS-400
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-400
>             Project: Commons Compress
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Archivers
>            Reporter: Simon Spero
>            Priority: Minor
>
> It is very useful to be able to add extra PAX headers to tar entries.  For 
> example, a tar file containing maven artifacts could have extra headers 
> carrying the groupid, artifactid, version, classifier, etc.  
> If the appropriate prefixes are used, these headers can be extracted to posix 
> extended attributes by gnu and bsdtar.
> This change requires adding a map to TarArchiveEntry to carry the extra 
> headers, plus modifications to the TarArchive*Stream to save unrecognized 
> headers when reading, and to add any extra headers when writing. 
> I have created a prototype implementation, but have not merged it into my 
> fork of the project.  I don't have full tests written, because I was using 
> gnutar as an oracle.
>  I have also ignored the issue of writing values to standard headers like 
> size, though since the PAX specification states that doing things like 
> setting size=100 (if the real size is not in fact 100) is undefined, so I'm 
> technically in compliance.  The temptation is  to do what was asked, then on 
> close pop up a "Were you sure?" dialog, but that's mean.  I guess I could use 
> this to set the appropriate entry fields if doing so makes sense, but the 
> easiest approach  is to block setting any headers that would be consumed by 
> the tar implementation when reading. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to