[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16421319#comment-16421319
 ] 

Gary Gregory commented on COMPRESS-446:
---------------------------------------

I suppose you are correct, not as bad as I initially thought.

> Resource Leak in ParallelScatterZipCreator#writeTo(ZipArchiveOutputStream)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COMPRESS-446
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-446
>             Project: Commons Compress
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Archivers
>    Affects Versions: 1.16.1
>         Environment: The application was running inside a Docker container, 
> the JVM had about 1.7 GByte heap space.
>            Reporter: Christoph Ludwig
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.17
>
>
> Before it does anything else, 
> {{ParallelScatterZipCreator#writeTo(ZipArchiveOutputStream)}} loops over all 
> futures returned by the creator`s executor service and calls 
> {{Future#get()}}. This will block until the future's computation is 
> completed, respectively - i.e., until all entries have been written to the 
> thread-local scatter streams.
> However, if the computation of a future fails, then {{Future#get()}} can also 
> throw an exception. This exception escapes 
> {{ParallelScatterZipCreator#writeTo(ZipArchiveOutputStream)}} before the 
> executor service is shut down. The latter means that also the thread-local 
> variables in the executor service's threads and all objects referenced by 
> them continue to exist and cannot be reclaimed by the GC.
> I encountered this situation when - while processing an archive with 130,000 
> documents - the JVM threw an {{OutOfMemoryError}}. The application was not 
> able to recover from this OOM error because most of the heap was occupied by 
> objects reachable from the executor service's threads.
> Of course, the OOM is mostly the fault of my own code; I will be able to work 
> around the "leaked" executor service because I supply it in the first place 
> and can therefore shut it down if I detect an error situation.  
> The effect would be the same, though, if, say, {{Future#get()}} throws an 
> {{InterruptedException}}. Therefore, 
> {{ParallelScatterZipCreator#writeTo(ZipArchiveOutputStream)}}  should either 
> shut down and release all resources if it cannot complete its task due to an 
> Exception thrown by a future or it should offer a reasonable recovery 
> strategy. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to