[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16838567#comment-16838567
 ] 

Jarek Jarcec Cecho commented on JEXL-299:
-----------------------------------------

That was really fast, thank you [~henrib]!

> Improve message error when method could not be found
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JEXL-299
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-299
>             Project: Commons JEXL
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.1
>            Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>            Assignee: Henri Biestro
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.2
>
>
> We incorporated JEXL into our product and it's working really well - thanks 
> for all the hard work and effort that went into the project!
> One thing that that does stand out as a possible improvement is to increase 
> the verbosity of the following message:
> {code}
> org.apache.commons.jexl3.JexlException$Method: 
> com.streamsets.datacollector.antennadoctor.engine.AntennaDoctorEngine.evaluateCondition@1:48
>  unsolvable function/method 'intersection'
> {code}
> It took us a few hours the first time we saw this exception as the 
> {{intersection}} method definitely existed. It turned out that we were 
> mistakenly calling it with an array rather than with expected list and thus 
> method {{intersection(Object[]}} was indeed not found as only 
> {{intersection(List)}} was present.
> Any chance to improve the error message and in addition to printing the 
> missing method also print the argument which Jexl is trying to match? E.g. 
> something like:
> {code}
> org.apache.commons.jexl3.JexlException$Method:  unsolvable function/method 
> 'intersection(Object[])'
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to