fche commented on pull request #459: URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/459#issuecomment-696764653
> > Caveat: Instances of [Random](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/Random.html), upon which the implementation of this class relies, are not cryptographically secure. > > doesn't lead the reader to conclude the class is not to be used for the purpose of security and in turn minimally use `SecureRandom` (as stipulated in the `java.util.Random` javadoc, to which we've linked). Any chance of coming around to "let's be secure" as a default position? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
