[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-6724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14101016#comment-14101016
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CB-6724:
------------------------------------

GitHub user eymorale opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-network-information/pull/17

    CB-6724

    documentation for manual tests

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/eymorale/cordova-plugin-network-information 
CB-6724

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-network-information/pull/17.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #17
    
----
commit e95173d567479ea25ee831ae958beaf33ae22cec
Author: Staci Cooper <[email protected]>
Date:   2014-07-16T17:51:46Z

    CB-6964 ported manual tests
    
    Fixed up style

commit 807f839bfe751b70f9e66d34ff80e06781f3cf81
Author: Edna Morales <[email protected]>
Date:   2014-07-28T20:43:09Z

    merged changes from addEventListener typo

commit c0d76930e9c893a2ff21d21dc47fc193644b0580
Author: Edna Morales <[email protected]>
Date:   2014-07-28T20:58:13Z

    added documentation for manual tests

commit cda67c838c7220051ccdd1a6ee2ff08129c9da15
Author: Edna Morales <[email protected]>
Date:   2014-08-13T17:22:05Z

    Merge renamed tests dir

----


> manual tests should have docs indicating the expected result
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CB-6724
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-6724
>             Project: Apache Cordova
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: mobile-spec
>            Reporter: Marcel Kinard
>            Assignee: Edna Morales
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The manual tests in mobile-spec have buttons that do things and test the 
> functions, but there is no indication and no documentation associated with 
> those tests that indicate what the expected result should be. So it becomes 
> difficult to compare the expected result with the actual result, unless you 
> are very familiar with the function and know in your head what the expected 
> result should be. It would be good if the expected result is documented, so 
> non-experts can run the manual tests and validate the results.
> The manual tests for InAppBrowser do include some documentation of the 
> expected inline with the buttons, so that may be considered a prototype of 
> what is needed here.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to