[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477209#comment-13477209
]
Daniel Kulp commented on CXF-4570:
----------------------------------
Personally, I'm against this change. Per various specs (such as SAAJ), the
Headers map for the attachment should be the exact headers that are passing in
the mime part on the wire.
> Attachment Header Content-ID conversion
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-4570
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4570
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JAX-WS Runtime
> Reporter: Jinhua Wang
> Attachments: AttachmentUtil.java.patch
>
>
> I have a migrating problem for headers in attachment.
> For example, the message sent out contains Content-ID:<foo>,
> Content-ID header value is "<foo>" instead of "foo" at server side.
> When creating attachment of the following code:
> org.apache.cxf.attachment.AttachmentUtil.createAttachment(InputStream,
> InternetHeaders)
> There's a id conversion at first. But in the following header processing,
> there's no id conversion for Content-ID.
> Since Content-ID conversion is needed for id("new AttachmentImpl(id)"), I
> think it is also useful for headers.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
