[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16973837#comment-16973837
 ] 

Andriy Redko commented on CXF-8154:
-----------------------------------

Yeah, definitely, in case of JAX-RS you have an option to provide your own 
ExceptionMapper(s) and enrich the response with whatever details you would like 
to include. Just a couple of links for you

[1] 
[https://cxf.apache.org/docs/jax-rs-basics.html#JAX-RSBasics-Exceptionhandling]

[2] 
[https://dennis-xlc.gitbooks.io/restful-java-with-jax-rs-2-0-en/cn/part1/chapter7/exception_handling.html]

[3] [https://github.com/zalando/problem]

If you don't mind, I am closing this issue since it is not intrinsic to CXF. 


Thanks.

> No "Reason Phrase" Sent with HTTP Responses
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-8154
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8154
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-RS
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.4
>         Environment: Apache Tomcat 8.5, OpenJDK 1.8
>            Reporter: Mike Kelly
>            Priority: Minor
>
> When I throw, for example, a {{javax.ws.rs.NotFoundException}}, my 
> expectation is that the response would start with a Status Line like:
> {noformat}
> HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
> {noformat}
> However, I just get a response like:
> {noformat}
> HTTP/1.1 404
> {noformat}
> This seems to be true both if I provide a {{message}} when I construct the 
> exception, or if I use the no argument constructor.
> This is similarly true for any exceptions triggered internally by CXF, for 
> example if I make a request with an unsupported method. The stack trace in my 
> logs shows a {{javax.ws.rs.ClientErrorException: HTTP 406 Not Acceptable}}, 
> but the response just shows {{HTTP/1.1 406}}.
> My expectation is that either the appropriate default "reason phrase", or the 
> {{message}} I provided to my constructed exception, would be returned to the 
> caller?
> My reading of RFC 2616 is that such a reason phrase is not optional: 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-6.1



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to