[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Wins updated CXF-8955:
------------------------------
    Environment: Fedora 36, Java 17, cxf 4.0.3  (was: Fedora 36, Java 17, cxf 
4.0.2)

> Custom timeout with Message.RECEIVE_TIMEOUT not working with hc5
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-8955
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8955
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-WS Runtime
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.3
>         Environment: Fedora 36, Java 17, cxf 4.0.3
>            Reporter: Michael Wins
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: cxf_timeout_bug.tar-2.gz
>
>
> Hi, I am trying to set custom read timeouts for WS operations in an 
> interceptor:
> {code:java}
> public class CustomReadTimeoutInterceptor extends 
> AbstractPhaseInterceptor<Message> {
> ...
> @Override
> public void handleMessage(Message message) {
>   message.put(Message.RECEIVE_TIMEOUT, timeoutMillis);
> }
> ...{code}
> That works well when using the JDK http client, but it does NOT work with the 
> hc5 async client.
> It looks like requests issued in parallel affect each others timeout settings.
>  
> Download the attached sample project, which contains a 
> CustomReadTimeoutInterceptor and starts two requests in parallel with 
> different timeouts (4 and 2 seconds).
> Execute both 
> {code:java}
> mvn
> {code}
> and
> {code:java}
> mvn -DuseAsync
> {code}
> and compare the output. The output of the first will be like
> {code:java}
> CLIENT[19]: Duration: 2010 millis 
> CLIENT[29]: Duration: 4211 millis{code}
> (which is as expected) whereas the second - using hc5 async - will result in
> {code:java}
> CLIENT[29]: Duration: 4269 millis  
> CLIENT[19]: Duration: 4012 millis{code}
> Now I am wondering if my code is somehow incorrect or if it is cxf's fault...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to