[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Victoria Markman updated DRILL-2204:
------------------------------------
    Component/s:     (was: Execution - Data Types)
                 Execution - Flow

> DISTINCT statement over UNION ALL subquery asserts during execution with 
> streaming aggregation
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-2204
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2204
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Execution - Flow
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.0
>            Reporter: Victoria Markman
>            Assignee: Daniel Barclay (Drill/MapR)
>
> {code}
> 0: jdbc:drill:schema=dfs> select distinct sq.x1, sq.x2, sq.x3 from ( select 
> a1, b1, c1 from t1 union all select a2, b2, c2 from t2 ) as sq(x1,x2,x3);
> +------------+------------+------------+
> |     x1     |     x2     |     x3     |
> +------------+------------+------------+
> Query failed: RemoteRpcException: Failure while running fragment., Failure 
> while reading vector.  Expected vector class of 
> org.apache.drill.exec.vector.NullableVarCharVector but was holding vector 
> class org.apache.drill.exec.vector.NullableIntVector. [ 
> dd2fedd7-bbee-40a4-8a26-9ca86fa774f6 on atsqa4-134.qa.lab:31010 ]
> [ dd2fedd7-bbee-40a4-8a26-9ca86fa774f6 on atsqa4-134.qa.lab:31010 ]
> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.sql.SQLException: Failure while executing 
> query.
>         at sqlline.SqlLine$IncrementalRows.hasNext(SqlLine.java:2514)
>         at sqlline.SqlLine$TableOutputFormat.print(SqlLine.java:2148)
>         at sqlline.SqlLine.print(SqlLine.java:1809)
>         at sqlline.SqlLine$Commands.execute(SqlLine.java:3766)
>         at sqlline.SqlLine$Commands.sql(SqlLine.java:3663)
>         at sqlline.SqlLine.dispatch(SqlLine.java:889)
>         at sqlline.SqlLine.begin(SqlLine.java:763)
>         at sqlline.SqlLine.start(SqlLine.java:498)
>         at sqlline.SqlLine.main(SqlLine.java:460)
> {code}
> Plan:
> {code}
> 00-01      Project(x1=[$0], x2=[$1], x3=[$2])
> 00-02        StreamAgg(group=[{0, 1, 2}])
> 00-03          Sort(sort0=[$0], sort1=[$1], sort2=[$2], dir0=[ASC], 
> dir1=[ASC], dir2=[ASC])
> 00-04            Project(x1=[$0], x2=[$1], x3=[$2])
> 00-05              UnionAll(all=[true])
> 00-07                Project(a1=[$2], b1=[$1], c1=[$0])
> 00-09                  Scan(groupscan=[ParquetGroupScan 
> [entries=[ReadEntryWithPath [path=maprfs:/aggregation/sanity/t1]], 
> selectionRoot=/aggregation/sanity/t1, numFiles=1, columns=[`a1`, `b1`, 
> `c1`]]])
> 00-06                Project(a2=[$1], b2=[$0], c2=[$2])
> 00-08                  Scan(groupscan=[ParquetGroupScan 
> [entries=[ReadEntryWithPath [path=maprfs:/aggregation/sanity/t2]], 
> selectionRoot=/aggregation/sanity/t2, numFiles=1, columns=[`a2`, `b2`, 
> `c2`]]])
> {code}
> Query works if columns in the union query have the same name.
> {code}
> 0: jdbc:drill:schema=dfs> select distinct sq.x1, sq.x2, sq.x3 from ( select 
> a1, b1, c1 from t1 union all select a1, b1, c1 from t4 ) as sq(x1,x2,x3);
> +------------+------------+------------+
> |     x1     |     x2     |     x3     |
> +------------+------------+------------+
> | 1          | aaaaa      | 2015-01-01 |
> | 2          | bbbbb      | 2015-01-02 |
> | 3          | ccccc      | 2015-01-03 |
> | 4          | null       | 2015-01-04 |
> | 5          | eeeee      | 2015-01-05 |
> | 6          | fffff      | 2015-01-06 |
> | 7          | ggggg      | 2015-01-07 |
> | 9          | iiiii      | null       |
> | 10         | jjjjj      | 2015-01-10 |
> | null       | hhhhh      | 2015-01-08 |
> +------------+------------+------------+
> 10 rows selected (0.131 seconds)
> {code}
> It's possible, that bug is caused by drill-2203, but I'm filing it anyway, 
> because the way it fails it is different and will need to be verified after 
> it is fixed. Tables for the query are attached in drill-2203



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to