[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14384205#comment-14384205 ]
Daniel Barclay (Drill) commented on DRILL-2604: ----------------------------------------------- Don't forget to check what the SQL specification says. (I think I saw that it says that implicit cast rules are implementation-defined, but there could be some requirement or prohibitions.) > Make sure implicit casting rules are the same across drill > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DRILL-2604 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2604 > Project: Apache Drill > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Execution - Data Types > Affects Versions: 0.8.0 > Reporter: Victoria Markman > Assignee: Daniel Barclay (Drill) > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > > This is an enhancement request to standartize rules of implicit cast. > It would be nice if rules in joins, set operations and functions where the > same. > Number of inconistencies have been found and reported under: > drill-2549 - Implicit Cast between integer and varchar columns in a join > should work > drill-2433 - Implicit cast between date and timestamp is missing in joins > We agreed that this is not 1.0 item and above mentioned bugs will not be > resolved by GA -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)