[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Chris Westin updated DRILL-2603:
--------------------------------
    Assignee: Daniel Barclay (Drill)

> Review, resolve NULL checks/isNull()/null around vectors, accessors, JDBC 
> SQLAccessor, etc.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-2603
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2603
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Execution - Data Types
>            Reporter: Daniel Barclay (Drill)
>            Assignee: Daniel Barclay (Drill)
>             Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> Review the checking for SQL NULL and mapping to Java null (for non-primitive 
> types) from the vector and vector access layer up through the JDBC layer 
> (e.g., SQLAccessors (which is just for JDBC)), resolve where checking should 
> be done, and specify that contract information in the Javadoc documentation.
> Considerations:
> - With DRILL-2463, there are now some redundant checks for SQL NULL.
> - Get methods returning non-primitive types must follow a different pattern, 
> since they can't return Java null.
> - Behavior that is very specific to JDBC usually should be implemented in the 
> JDBC layer.  (For example, JDBC's NULL-reporting protocol of calling 
> getInt(...) and then calling wasNull() shouldn't appear in lower layers 
> (e.g., the planned DrillClient-level public interface) unless we 
> intentionally choose that protocol for there.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to