[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15151816#comment-15151816
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-4410:
---------------------------------------

Github user jaltekruse commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/380#issuecomment-185568844
  
    Can you generate these files in the tests rather than check them in?


> ListVector causes OversizedAllocationException
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-4410
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4410
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components:  Server
>            Reporter: MinJi Kim
>            Assignee: MinJi Kim
>
> Reading large data set with array/list causes the following problem.  This 
> happens when union type is enabled.
> (org.apache.drill.exec.exception.OversizedAllocationException) Unable to 
> expand the buffer. Max allowed buffer size is reached.
> org.apache.drill.exec.vector.UInt1Vector.reAlloc():214
> org.apache.drill.exec.vector.UInt1Vector$Mutator.setSafe():406
> org.apache.drill.exec.vector.complex.ListVector$Mutator.setNotNull():298
> org.apache.drill.exec.vector.complex.ListVector$Mutator.startNewValue():307
> org.apache.drill.exec.vector.complex.impl.UnionListWriter.startList():563
> org.apache.drill.exec.vector.complex.impl.ComplexCopier.writeValue():115
> org.apache.drill.exec.vector.complex.impl.ComplexCopier.copy():100
> org.apache.drill.exec.vector.complex.ListVector.copyFrom():97
> org.apache.drill.exec.vector.complex.ListVector.copyFromSafe():89
> org.apache.drill.exec.test.generated.HashJoinProbeGen197.projectBuildRecord():356
> org.apache.drill.exec.test.generated.HashJoinProbeGen197.executeProbePhase():173
> org.apache.drill.exec.test.generated.HashJoinProbeGen197.probeAndProject():223
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.join.HashJoinBatch.innerNext():233
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next():162
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next():119
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next():109
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractSingleRecordBatch.innerNext():51
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.project.ProjectRecordBatch.innerNext():129
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next():162
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next():119
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next():109
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractSingleRecordBatch.innerNext():51
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.project.ProjectRecordBatch.innerNext():129
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next():162
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.BaseRootExec.next():104
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.SingleSenderCreator$SingleSenderRootExec.innerNext():92
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.BaseRootExec.next():94
> org.apache.drill.exec.work.fragment.FragmentExecutor$1.run():257
> org.apache.drill.exec.work.fragment.FragmentExecutor$1.run():251
> java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged():-2
> javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs():422
> org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs():1657
> org.apache.drill.exec.work.fragment.FragmentExecutor.run():251
> org.apache.drill.common.SelfCleaningRunnable.run():38
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker():1142
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run():617
> java.lang.Thread.run():745 (state=,code=0)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to