[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15468349#comment-15468349
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-4726:
---------------------------------------
Github user paul-rogers commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/574#discussion_r77705170
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/expr/fn/DrillFunctionRegistry.java
---
@@ -218,4 +302,141 @@ private void
registerOperatorsWithoutInference(DrillOperatorTable operatorTable)
}
}
}
+
+ /**
+ * Function registry holder. Stores function implementations by jar
name, function name.
+ */
+ private class GenericRegistryHolder<T, U> {
+ private final ReadWriteLock readWriteLock = new
ReentrantReadWriteLock();
+ private final AutoCloseableLock readLock = new
AutoCloseableLock(readWriteLock.readLock());
+ private final AutoCloseableLock writeLock = new
AutoCloseableLock(readWriteLock.writeLock());
+
+ // jar name, Map<function name, List<signature>
+ private final Map<T, Map<T, List<T>>> jars;
+
+ // function name, Map<signature, function holder>
+ private final Map<T, Map<T, U>> functions;
+
+ public GenericRegistryHolder() {
+ this.functions = Maps.newHashMap();
+ this.jars = Maps.newHashMap();
+ }
+
+ public void addJar(T jName, Map<T, Pair<T, U>> sNameMap) {
+ try (AutoCloseableLock lock = writeLock.open()) {
+ Map<T, List<T>> map = jars.get(jName);
+ if (map != null) {
+ removeAllByJar(jName);
+ }
+ map = Maps.newHashMap();
+ jars.put(jName, map);
+
+ for (Entry<T, Pair<T, U>> entry : sNameMap.entrySet()) {
+ T sName = entry.getKey();
+ Pair<T, U> pair = entry.getValue();
+ addFunction(jName, pair.getKey(), sName, pair.getValue());
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ public void removeJar(T jName) {
+ try (AutoCloseableLock lock = writeLock.open()) {
+ removeAllByJar(jName);
+ }
+ }
+
+ public List<T> getAllJarNames() {
+ try (AutoCloseableLock lock = readLock.open()) {
+ return Lists.newArrayList(jars.keySet());
+ }
+ }
+
+ public List<T> getAllFunctionNames(T jName) {
+ try (AutoCloseableLock lock = readLock.open()){
+ Map<T, List<T>> map = jars.get(jName);
+ return map == null ? Lists.<T>newArrayList() :
Lists.newArrayList(map.keySet());
+ }
+ }
+
+ public ListMultimap<T, U> getAllFunctionsWithHolders() {
+ try (AutoCloseableLock lock = readLock.open()) {
+ ListMultimap<T, U> multimap = ArrayListMultimap.create();
+ for (Entry<T, Map<T, U>> entry : functions.entrySet()) {
+ multimap.putAll(entry.getKey(),
Lists.newArrayList(entry.getValue().values()));
+ }
+ return multimap;
+ }
+ }
+
+ public ListMultimap<T, T> getAllFunctionsWithSignatures() {
+ try (AutoCloseableLock lock = readLock.open()) {
+ ListMultimap<T, T> multimap = ArrayListMultimap.create();
+ for (Entry<T, Map<T, U>> entry : functions.entrySet()) {
+ multimap.putAll(entry.getKey(),
Lists.newArrayList(entry.getValue().keySet()));
+ }
+ return multimap;
+ }
+ }
+
+ public List<U> getHoldersByFunctionName(T fName) {
+ try (AutoCloseableLock lock = readLock.open()) {
+ Map<T, U> map = functions.get(fName);
+ return map == null ? Lists.<U>newArrayList() :
Lists.newArrayList(map.values());
+ }
+ }
+
+ public boolean containsJar(T jName) {
+ try (AutoCloseableLock lock = readLock.open()) {
+ return jars.containsKey(jName);
+ }
+ }
+
+ public int functionsSize() {
+ try (AutoCloseableLock lock = readLock.open()) {
+ return functions.size();
+ }
+ }
+
+ private void addFunction(T jName, T fName, T sName, U fHolder) {
+ Map<T, List<T>> map = jars.get(jName);
+
+ List<T> list = map.get(fName);
+ if (list == null) {
+ list = Lists.newArrayList();
+ map.put(fName, list);
+ }
+
+ if (!list.contains(sName)) {
--- End diff --
We are adding a function for a jar. We've just discovered some other
function has the same signature. What can this possibly represent? Two
functions in the same jar with the same signature? Is this valid Java? Or, does
it represent botch annotations? Should we raise an error if this case exists?
(If we are replacing a jar, we previously removed all functions for the jar, so
this can't just be a case of overwriting. If it were, we'd want to overwrite,
not ignore, the new signature.
> Dynamic UDFs support
> --------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-4726
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4726
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0
> Reporter: Arina Ielchiieva
> Assignee: Arina Ielchiieva
> Fix For: Future
>
>
> Allow register UDFs without restart of Drillbits.
> Design is described in document below:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FfyJtWae5TLuyheHCfldYUpCdeIezR2RlNsrOTYyAB4/edit?usp=sharing
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
