[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15987902#comment-15987902
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-5140:
---------------------------------------
Github user jinfengni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/818#discussion_r113825753
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/expr/ClassGenerator.java ---
@@ -66,7 +68,17 @@
public static final GeneratorMapping DEFAULT_CONSTANT_MAP =
GM("doSetup", "doSetup", null, null);
static final org.slf4j.Logger logger =
org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getLogger(ClassGenerator.class);
- public static enum BlockType {SETUP, EVAL, RESET, CLEANUP};
+
+ /**
+ * Field has 2 indexes within the constant pull: field item + name and
type item.
--- End diff --
I could not make sense how you calculate this number of 26767. According to
JVM spec [1], the constant pool table consists of 2 or more bytes "info"
section for each item. In some case like class name, one item could use 2
bytes, while in other cases like field, method, one item could use 4 bytes.
Integer uses 4 bytes, and Long constants uses 8 bytes.
That is, if I have a class with fields < 26767, we may still hit the
complain of "too many constants".
1. http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se7/html/jvms-4.html#jvms-4.4
> Fix CompileException in run-time generated code when record batch has large
> number of fields.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-5140
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5140
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Execution - Flow
> Affects Versions: 1.9.0
> Reporter: Khurram Faraaz
> Assignee: Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: drill_5117.q, manyColumns.csv
>
>
> CTAS that does SELECT over 5003 columns fails with CompileException: File
> 'org.apache.drill.exec.compile.DrillJavaFileObject...
> Drill 1.9.0 git commit ID : 4c1b420b
> CTAS statement and CSV data file are attached.
> I ran test with and without setting the below system option, test failed in
> both cases.
> alter system set `exec.java_compiler`='JDK';
> sqlline session just closes with below message, after the failing CTAS is
> executed.
> Closing: org.apache.drill.jdbc.impl.DrillConnectionImpl
> Stack trace from drillbit.log
> {noformat}
> 2016-12-20 12:02:16,016 [27a6e241-99b1-1f2a-8a91-394f8166e969:frag:0:0] ERROR
> o.a.d.e.w.fragment.FragmentExecutor - SYSTEM ERROR: CompileException: File
> 'org.apache.drill.exec.compile.DrillJavaFileObject[ProjectorGen45.java]',
> Line 11, Column 8: ProjectorGen45.java:11: error: too many constants
> public class ProjectorGen45 {
> ^ (compiler.err.limit.pool)
> Fragment 0:0
> [Error Id: ced84dce-669d-47c2-b5d2-5e0559dbd9fd on centos-01.qa.lab:31010]
> org.apache.drill.common.exceptions.UserException: SYSTEM ERROR:
> CompileException: File
> 'org.apache.drill.exec.compile.DrillJavaFileObject[ProjectorGen45.java]',
> Line 11, Column 8: ProjectorGen45.java:11: error: too many constants
> public class ProjectorGen45 {
> ^ (compiler.err.limit.pool)
> Fragment 0:0
> [Error Id: ced84dce-669d-47c2-b5d2-5e0559dbd9fd on centos-01.qa.lab:31010]
> at
> org.apache.drill.common.exceptions.UserException$Builder.build(UserException.java:543)
> ~[drill-common-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.work.fragment.FragmentExecutor.sendFinalState(FragmentExecutor.java:293)
> [drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.work.fragment.FragmentExecutor.cleanup(FragmentExecutor.java:160)
> [drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.work.fragment.FragmentExecutor.run(FragmentExecutor.java:262)
> [drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.common.SelfCleaningRunnable.run(SelfCleaningRunnable.java:38)
> [drill-common-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> [na:1.8.0_91]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> [na:1.8.0_91]
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [na:1.8.0_91]
> Caused by: org.apache.drill.exec.exception.SchemaChangeException: Failure
> while attempting to load generated class
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.project.ProjectRecordBatch.setupNewSchema(ProjectRecordBatch.java:487)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractSingleRecordBatch.innerNext(AbstractSingleRecordBatch.java:78)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.project.ProjectRecordBatch.innerNext(ProjectRecordBatch.java:135)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next(AbstractRecordBatch.java:162)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next(AbstractRecordBatch.java:119)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next(AbstractRecordBatch.java:109)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractSingleRecordBatch.innerNext(AbstractSingleRecordBatch.java:51)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.project.ProjectRecordBatch.innerNext(ProjectRecordBatch.java:135)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next(AbstractRecordBatch.java:162)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next(AbstractRecordBatch.java:119)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next(AbstractRecordBatch.java:109)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.WriterRecordBatch.innerNext(WriterRecordBatch.java:91)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next(AbstractRecordBatch.java:162)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next(AbstractRecordBatch.java:119)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next(AbstractRecordBatch.java:109)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractSingleRecordBatch.innerNext(AbstractSingleRecordBatch.java:51)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.project.ProjectRecordBatch.innerNext(ProjectRecordBatch.java:135)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.record.AbstractRecordBatch.next(AbstractRecordBatch.java:162)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.BaseRootExec.next(BaseRootExec.java:104)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.ScreenCreator$ScreenRoot.innerNext(ScreenCreator.java:81)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.physical.impl.BaseRootExec.next(BaseRootExec.java:94)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.work.fragment.FragmentExecutor$1.run(FragmentExecutor.java:232)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.work.fragment.FragmentExecutor$1.run(FragmentExecutor.java:226)
> ~[drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> ~[na:1.8.0_91]
> at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:422) ~[na:1.8.0_91]
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1595)
> ~[hadoop-common-2.7.0-mapr-1607.jar:na]
> at
> org.apache.drill.exec.work.fragment.FragmentExecutor.run(FragmentExecutor.java:226)
> [drill-java-exec-1.9.0.jar:1.9.0]
> ... 4 common frames omitted
> Caused by: org.apache.drill.exec.exception.ClassTransformationException:
> java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
> org.apache.drill.exec.exception.ClassTransformationException: Failure
> generating transformation classes for value:
> ...
> {noformat}
> Thanks,
> Khurram
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
