[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-6613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16548893#comment-16548893
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-6613:
---------------------------------------

sohami commented on a change in pull request #1383: DRILL-6613: Refactor 
MaterializedField
URL: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/1383#discussion_r203605336
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/join/HashJoinBatch.java
 ##########
 @@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ private void setupOutputContainerSchema() {
         }
 
         // make sure to project field with children for children to show up in 
the schema
-        final MaterializedField projected = field.withType(outputType);
+        final MaterializedField projected = field.copy(outputType);
 
 Review comment:
   How about naming functions as `copyWithType` and `copyWithName` ?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Refactor MaterializedField
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-6613
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-6613
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Vlad Rozov
>            Assignee: Vlad Rozov
>            Priority: Minor
>
> {{MaterializedField}} does not need to implement {{clone()}} and should use 
> constructor.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to