[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-6628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arina Ielchiieva updated DRILL-6628:
------------------------------------
Priority: Major (was: Minor)
> Possible incorporation of Twitter text processing UDFs into Drill-proper
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-6628
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-6628
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Functions - Drill
> Reporter: Bob Rudis
> Priority: Major
> Labels: doc-impacting
>
> Per the User mailing list thread —
> [https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/drill-user/201807.mbox/%3Caef1979d-f454-4691-8607-8267adf2ac1e%40getmailbird.com%3E]
> — submitting the possibility for the inclusion of drill-twitter-text —
> [https://github.com/hrbrmstr/drill-twitter-text] — into Drill-proper.
> Shifting the conversation here since it's more appropriate and CC'ing
> [~cgivre] who posited the idea.
> On the one hand, there are function groups such as "Phonetic" and "String
> Distance" so there's precedent for inclusion of "non-boring-SQL"-like
> functions into Drill-proper. On the other hand, this is a small addition of a
> handful of functions for Twitter text so would this be to niche for a
> "Twitter" function group?
> As noted in the mailing list thread, there are more "cyber"-ish UDFs on the
> way (still kinda hoping for that guava upgrade that I saw mentioned in
> various places in jira), so would the Twitter components be in a "Cyber"
> group?
> Regardless, I'll take a look at how the functions are structured in the Drill
> source tree and gladly machinate the necessary changes/inclusions if the
> result of this discussion results in that decision.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
