[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17402122#comment-17402122
]
Cong Luo edited comment on DRILL-7987 at 8/20/21, 9:14 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
[~CoolKangaroo2020] Sure. Thanks for your interest in the Apache Drill. there
is a link resource about the [Drill : 1.19.0
API|https://drill.apache.org/apidocs/overview-summary.html]. Then, Welcome to
join our [Slack Channel|https://bit.ly/3t4rozO].
was (Author: luoc):
[~CoolKangaroo2020] Sure. Thanks for your interest in the Apache Drill. there
is a link resource about the [Drill : 1.19.0
API|[https://drill.apache.org/apidocs/overview-summary.html].]. Then, Welcome
to join our [Slack Channel|https://bit.ly/3t4rozO].
> Missing Javadoc
> ---------------
>
> Key: DRILL-7987
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7987
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: CoolGuy
> Priority: Minor
>
> Hello! I find in your [Contribution
> Guidelines|http://drill.apache.org/docs/apache-drill-contribution-guidelines/]
> that
> ??All public classes and methods should have informative Javadoc comments.??
> However, I still witness some public classes without Javadocs, e.g.,
> * protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/proto/BitData.java
> *
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/MergingReceiverCreator.java
> *
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/common/HashTable.java
> ......
> I also find likely missing Javadoc for public methods in the following files:
> * drill-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/yarn/core/YarnRMClient.java
> * protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/proto/SchemaBitControl.java
> ......
> Would you like to add Javadoc for these methods or classes, or they are just
> not that important?
> If there is anything I can help with?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
