[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-1274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Kishore updated DRILL-1274:
----------------------------------
Assignee: DrillCommitter (was: Aditya Kishore)
> Update License file to correctly identify source inclusions versus binary
> inclusions
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-1274
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-1274
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Tools, Build & Test
> Affects Versions: 0.5.0
> Reporter: Jacques Nadeau
> Assignee: DrillCommitter
> Fix For: 0.5.0
>
> Attachments:
> 0002-DRILL-1274-Update-License-file-to-correctly-identify.patch,
> DRILL-1274-binary-license.patch
>
>
> Issues found with last release:
> - LICENSE file is not correct - looks like quite a few things need to be
> removed as they are not actually bundled in the source artefact. The LICENSE
> file in the source artefact should only reference software that is actually
> bundled in the source release.
> - LICENSE file doesn't need to contain references to Apache licensed software
> only MIT and BSD software. Each bundled Apache software may modify the NOTICE
> file.
> - LICENSE issue "The compiled Apache Drill distribution includes the
> following sources/binaries." is incorrect as a source distribution shouldn't
> normally contain binaries.
> - LICENSE refers to CDDL licensed, CPL licensed, EPL licensed and MPL
> licensed software - all which are category B licences. Are these actually
> included in the source release and if so how? And if they are included why
> are they not in the NOTICE file (as per [2]) If not included why are these
> mentioned in the the LICENCES file at all?
> I think the issue is we're using the same license file for both source and
> binary tarballs. We need to separate these out.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
