[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14166481#comment-14166481
 ] 

Hanifi Gunes commented on DRILL-1519:
-------------------------------------

Sounds good. DRILL-1504 looks very much similar. My understanding is that the 
description above is the root cause of the leak. I am not sure what happens 
when the fragment memory limit is enabled/disabled though. Regardless, I expect 
that the problem will persist.

> Concurrent access to WorkEventBus#getOrCreateFragmentManager leaks memory.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-1519
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-1519
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Hanifi Gunes
>            Assignee: Hanifi Gunes
>
> WorkEventBus uses a ConcurrentHashMap to ensure there is one and only one 
> FragmentManager corresponding to each unique FragmentHandle. The method 
> creates a FragmentManager that reserves some initial memory if a thread 
> observes that it is not in the map. However, in case of concurrent access, we 
> still need to clean up after if multiple threads observe that FragmentManager 
> does not exist and create multiple FragmentManagers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to