[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17102872#comment-17102872
]
Michael Vorburger commented on FINERACT-937:
--------------------------------------------
What's interesting is that we can see that upstream Ubuntu definitely does have
more recent Java, check this out:
{code}$ podman run -it ubuntu:bionic
root@9927ec862bf6:/# apt-get update
root@9927ec862bf6:/# apt-get install openjdk-11-jdk
root@9927ec862bf6:/# java -version
openjdk version "11.0.7" 2020-04-14
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-2ubuntu218.04)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-2ubuntu218.04, mixed
mode, sharing){code}
So this is definitely a Travis base container (VM?) image issue, not upstream
Ubuntu being behind.
I have an idea though... let me try something entirely differently.
> Use Java 11 instead of 12 use on Travis
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-937
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-937
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael Vorburger
> Assignee: Michael Vorburger
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: technical
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> FINERACT-846 switched from openjdk8 to openjdk12 instead of openjdk11 in our
> .travis.yml, due to technical reasons explained further in details on
> https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/820/files, but the TL;DR is
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212885 re. "TLS 1.3 resumed session
> does not retain peer certificate chain".
> The goal of this issue is to build Fineract on Travis using JDK 11 instead of
> 12. (The "why" we should do this is also in a comment on
> https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/820/files.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
