[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17214142#comment-17214142
 ] 

Michael Vorburger commented on FINERACT-1203:
---------------------------------------------

What we decide to do here is indirectly relevant for some documentation I'm 
planning to contribute re. FINERACT-1177.

> Fix broken Executable WAR (and unify & ditch Executable JAR?)
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FINERACT-1203
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1203
>             Project: Apache Fineract
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael Vorburger
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: war.log
>
>
> I've noticed that the WAR we build is not a traditional Tomcat only WAR, but 
> a Spring Boot Executable WAR - but a broken one! :( Whereas our Executable 
> JAR works of course, our WAR with {{java -jar 
> fineract-provider/build/libs/fineract-provider.war}} fails to start, see 
> attached.
> [~ptuomola] and [~aleks] perhaps this is something one of you would like to 
> look into?
> If you can fix this, then it poses the question why we would build and 
> document and distribute and support two different artifacts. My vote, if this 
> can be fixed, could be to unify on only having a (both "traditional AND 
> Executable") WAR and no JAR. Unless there are reasons why that may be stupid, 
> and both are useful, even if the problem above was fixed. Thoughts?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to