[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17215895#comment-17215895
 ] 

Michael Vorburger commented on FINERACT-1207:
---------------------------------------------

Actually, I didn't mean just the 
{{fineract-provider/config/swagger/templates}}, but all of 
\{{fineract-provider/config/swagger}}... this may deserve a closer look by one 
of you.. from what (little!) I understand:
 * {{fineract-provider/config/swagger/config.json.template}} look like it' 
replaced by {{task buildJavaSdk}} properties in 
{{fineract-client/build.gradle}} now?
 * {{fineract-provider/config/swagger/fineract-input.yaml.template}} needs to 
stay as is, I believe (right?)
 * the 4 {{templates/*.mustache}} to customize README, api_doc, POM and 
gradle_wrapper: Similar point to what we were discussing re. Java templates: 
Maintaining those in Fineract, as de-facto a "fork" of the same templates which 
presumably are somewhere in the upstream code generator, is maintenance 
overhead. Why did we choose to customize them originally?

> Clean up fineract-provider/config/swagger following introduction of 
> fineract-client/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FINERACT-1207
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1207
>             Project: Apache Fineract
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael Vorburger
>            Assignee: Aleksandar Vidakovic
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> [~aleks] while code reviewing your 
> [https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1402/] for FINERACT-1189, I've 
> noticed that 
> [fineract-provider/config/swagger/|https://github.com/apache/fineract/tree/1d0d7c1bd8d20b10fa67743ceaa7372ce603278e/fineract-provider/config/swagger/]
>  still exists today (in that PR, and soon in develop, as I'm hoping to merge 
> ASAP).
> Was that intentional, or an oversight? That doesn't seem right, now, agreed?
> Do you want to raise a PR to just remove it? Or does what's there have to be 
> moved into the (new) {{fineract-client}} now?
> Or perhaps [~Grandolf49] you would like to do that?
> [~ptuomola] FYI



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to