[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17292487#comment-17292487
 ] 

Yemdjih Kaze Nasser commented on FINERACT-982:
----------------------------------------------

If I'm not mistaken, the docker build from before allowed an option to use 
mysql-connector for a containerized run. I think the issue with using 
mysql/mariadb connector in dev environment like for running tests still 
persists. Unless I've failed to really understand how FINERACT-1177 works, I 
think this still persists to some extent.
 

> Completely ditch use of Drizzle JDBC Driver after all
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FINERACT-982
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-982
>             Project: Apache Fineract
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael Vorburger
>            Assignee: Yemdjih Kaze Nasser
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: scalability
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> Fineract's use of the un-maintained Drizzle JDBC driver continues to cause 
> confusion and pains like FINERACT-980, and note e.g. the proposed removal of 
> the alternative MySQL JDBC driver in 
> [https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/887.]
> Some of the background to this is recorded e.g. in FINCN-26, FINERACT-761 and 
> LEGAL-462.
> LEGAL-462 has clarified that the Fineract ZIP distribution must include 
> Drizzle and cannot distribute the MariaDB or MySQL JDBC clients. We CAN, and 
> currently (given the confusion in FINERACT-980 apparently do?!) use it for 
> tests.
> What if to reduce variability we just removed that old Drizzle JDBC driver 
> after all? We could run our tests using (preferably) the very well maintained 
> MariaDB JDBC driver client (the actual DB server is a totally separate 
> discussion, see FINERACT-896). We would (have to) distribute the ZIP for 
> download without a JDBC driver, and just some documentation inviting users to 
> DL and add one.
> But the exact situation about distributing in a Docker container image isn't 
> clear, to me...
> FYI [~awasum], [~ptuomola], [~xurror]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to