Adam Saghy created FINERACT-2790:
------------------------------------
Summary: Merchant Issued Refund after Re-age on progressive loan
with down payment + additional installment causes NoSuchElementException
Key: FINERACT-2790
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2790
Project: Apache Fineract
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.15.0
Reporter: Adam Saghy
Assignee: Adam Saghy
Fix For: 1.16.0
*Summary*
A Merchant Issued Refund (MIR) on the progressive/advanced-payment-allocation
schedule can crash when the loan has an "additional" installment in its
persisted schedule (e.g. inserted by a prior re-age) and the product has down
payments enabled with a MERCHANT_ISSUED_REFUND payment-allocation rule using
futureInstallmentAllocationRule = LAST_INSTALLMENT. The failure surfaces as an
unwrapped NoSuchElementException.
{noformat}
java.util.NoSuchElementException: No value present
at java.base/java.util.Optional.orElseThrow(Optional.java:377)
at
org.apache.fineract.portfolio.loanproduct.calc.ProgressiveEMICalculator.getDueAmounts(ProgressiveEMICalculator.java:521)
at
...AdvancedPaymentScheduleTransactionProcessor.updateRepaymentPeriodBalances(...java:2932)
at
...handlingPaymentAllocationForInterestBearingProgressiveLoan(...java:2899)
at ...processAllocationsHorizontally(...java:2715)
at ...handleRepayment(...java:1972)
at ...handleInterestRefund(...java:675)
at
LoanAccountDomainServiceJpa.makeRefund(LoanAccountDomainServiceJpa.java:854)
at
LoanMerchantIssuedRefundCommandHandler.processCommand(LoanMerchantIssuedRefundCommandHandler.java:41)
{noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
