Ralph Hopman created FINERACT-2834:
--------------------------------------

             Summary: Expose the originating client charge ID on client payment 
transactions
                 Key: FINERACT-2834
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2834
             Project: Apache Fineract
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Charges
            Reporter: Ralph Hopman
            Assignee: Ralph Hopman


I would like the client transaction API to return the originating client charge 
ID for charge-payment transactions, so that I can associate each payment 
transaction with the exact client charge it pays without relying on charge 
names, amounts, or other ambiguous attributes.
h3. Acceptance Criteria
 * When a client charge is paid, the resulting client transaction response 
includes a field named {{{}clientChargeId{}}}.
 * The value of {{clientChargeId}} equals the ID of the client charge 
associated with the payment transaction.
 * The field is populated from the existing 
{{m_client_charge_paid_by.client_charge_id}} relationship.
 * The field is available when retrieving an individual client transaction 
through the public client transaction API.
 * Transactions that are not associated with a client charge may return 
{{clientChargeId}} as null or omit it according to the existing serialization 
policy.
 * Existing client transaction fields and API behavior remain unchanged.
 * Existing client transaction retrieval, reversal, and external-ID operations 
continue to work.
 * An integration test creates and pays a client charge, retrieves the 
resulting transaction through the public API, and verifies that 
{{clientChargeId}} matches the originating charge.

h3. Technical Notes
 * Add {{clientChargeId}} to the client transaction response data object.
 * Map the already-selected {{clientChargeId}} SQL column in the client 
transaction row mapper.
 * Keep the regression coverage in the existing client transaction integration 
test.
 * No database schema migration is required because the relationship and SQL 
selection already exist.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to