[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14293561#comment-14293561 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-938: -------------------------------------- Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/248#discussion_r23609808 --- Diff: flink-runtime/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManager.scala --- @@ -519,6 +519,12 @@ object JobManager { configuration.setString(ConfigConstants.FLINK_BASE_DIR_PATH_KEY, config.configDir + "/..") } + if (GlobalConfiguration.getString(ConfigConstants.JOB_MANAGER_IPC_ADDRESS_KEY, + null) == null) { + configuration.setString(ConfigConstants.JOB_MANAGER_IPC_ADDRESS_KEY, + InetAddress.getLocalHost.getHostName) + } + val hostname = configuration.getString(ConfigConstants.JOB_MANAGER_IPC_ADDRESS_KEY, null) --- End diff -- That is true for the TaskManager but not for the JobManager. For the TaskManager, we could replace the null default value with ```InetAddress.getLocalHost.getHostName``` at both places. > Change start-cluster.sh script so that users don't have to configure the > JobManager address > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FLINK-938 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-938 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Build System > Reporter: Robert Metzger > Assignee: Mingliang Qi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.9 > > > To improve the user experience, Flink should not require users to configure > the JobManager's address on a cluster. > In combination with FLINK-934, this would allow running Flink with decent > performance on a cluster without setting a single configuration value. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)