[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14501279#comment-14501279
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1908:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user DarkKnightCZ opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/609

    [FLINK-1908] JobManager startup delay isn't considered when using 
start-cluster.sh script

    Creates dependency on netcat package (nc)

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/DarkKnightCZ/flink FLINK-1908

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/609.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #609
    
----
commit a48eea0108e6bd19a826182e5f692f9561ec887c
Author: Lukáš Raška <lu...@raska.me>
Date:   2015-04-18T11:26:54Z

    [FLINK-1908] Use netcat to check if JobManager is accessible via RPC, 30 
seconds timeout

----


> JobManager startup delay isn't considered when using start-cluster.sh script
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-1908
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1908
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Distributed Runtime
>    Affects Versions: 0.9, 0.8.1
>         Environment: Linux
>            Reporter: Lukas Raska
>            Priority: Minor
>   Original Estimate: 5m
>  Remaining Estimate: 5m
>
> When starting Flink cluster via start-cluster.sh script, JobManager startup 
> can be delayed (as it's started asynchronously), which can result in failed 
> startup of several task managers.
> Solution is to wait certain amount of time and periodically check if RPC port 
> is accessible, then proceed with starting task managers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to