Github user kl0u commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3963#discussion_r118297586
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-libraries/flink-cep-scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/cep/scala/conditions/Context.scala
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.flink.cep.scala.conditions
    +
    +import java.io.Serializable
    +
    +/**
    +  * The context used when evaluating the {@link IterativeCondition 
condition}.
    +  */
    +trait Context[T] extends Serializable {
    +  /**
    +    * @return An { @link Iterable} over the already accepted elements
    +    *                    for a given pattern. Elements are iterated in the 
order they were
    +    *                    inserted in the pattern.
    +    * @param name The name of the pattern.
    +    */
    +  def apply(name: String): Iterable[T]
    +}
    --- End diff --
    
    Why having different method names between Java and Scala? In Java this 
method is called `getEventsForPattern()`. We could rename both to sth like 
`getEventsForState()` if you agree, but I would suggest that same methods 
should have the same name and also, specifically for this, writing 
`context(stateName)` does not really seem nice. If you agree I can change it 
and then merge. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to