GitHub user mlipkovich opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4655

    [FLINK-7567]: Removed keepPartitioning parameter from iterate method

    ## What is the purpose of the change
    
    Removed parameter keepPartitioning from DataStream#iterate method since 
it's ignored. Also slightly modified error message related to different 
parallelism levels of input and feedback streams
    
    ## Brief change log
    
      - Removed parameter keepPartitioning from DataStream#iterate 
    
    ## Verifying this change
    
    This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
    
    ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
    
      - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)  no
      - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: (yes / no) yes
      - The serializers: (yes / no / don't know) no
      - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / 
don't know) no
      - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know) no
    
    ## Documentation
    
      - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no) no
      - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / 
JavaDocs / not documented) not applicable
    


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/mlipkovich/flink FLINK-7567

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4655.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #4655
    
----
commit 2525aef6f65d297142472ae6532e3bddb08df0fd
Author: Mikhail Lipkovich <mikhail_lipkov...@epam.com>
Date:   2017-09-07T14:05:22Z

    [FLINK-7567]: Removed keepPartitioning parameter from iterate method

----


---

Reply via email to