Github user zjureel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4574#discussion_r141804405
--- Diff: docs/dev/types_serialization.md ---
@@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ conditions are fulfilled:
or have a public getter- and a setter- method that follows the Java beans
naming conventions for getters and setters.
+Note that when a data type can't be recognized as a POJO type, it will be
handled as GenericType.
--- End diff --
Sorry to reply late, and thank you for your suggestions @greghogan
In fact, I have some doubts about what information to be provided to the
users when the data can't be recognized as POJO type. Do you think data type
and serialization are sufficient here? thanks
---
