[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16235848#comment-16235848
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7870:
---------------------------------------

Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4887#discussion_r148552792
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/resourcemanager/ResourceManager.java
 ---
    @@ -874,6 +894,13 @@ public void handleError(final Exception exception) {
         */
        public abstract boolean stopWorker(ResourceID resourceID);
     
    +   /**
    +    * Cancel the allocation of a resource. If the resource allocation has 
not fulfilled, should cancel it.
    +    *
    +    * @param resourceProfile The resource description of the previous 
allocation
    +    */
    +   public abstract void cancelNewWorker(ResourceProfile resourceProfile);
    --- End diff --
    
    See my comment in the `SlotManager`. I think we don't need this call here. 
Rather, I would like the SlotManager to decide upon registration of a new 
resource whether it needs it or not and release the resource via calling 
`ResourceManagerActions#releaseResource`.


> SlotPool should cancel the slot request to RM if not need any more.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-7870
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7870
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Cluster Management
>            Reporter: shuai.xu
>            Assignee: shuai.xu
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: flip-6
>
> 1. SlotPool will request slot to rm if its slots are not enough.
> 2. If a slot request is not fulfilled in a certain time, SlotPool will treat 
> the request as timeout and send a new slot request by triggering a failover 
> in JobMaster, the previous request is not needed any more, but rm does not 
> know it.
> 3. This may cause the rm request much more resource than the job really need.
> For example:
> 1. A job need 100 slots. RM request 100 container to YARN.
> 2. But YARN is busy now, it has no resource for the job.
> 3. The job failover as the resource request not fulfilled in time.
> 4. It ask 100 slots again, now RM request 200 container to YARN.
> 5. If failover server time, the containers request  will become more and more.
> 6. Now YARN has resource, it will find that the job may need thousands of 
> containers. This is a waste of resources.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to