[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16296452#comment-16296452
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7468:
---------------------------------------

Github user zhijiangW commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4559#discussion_r157691096
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/io/network/partition/PipelinedSubpartition.java
 ---
    @@ -52,6 +54,10 @@
        /** Flag indicating whether the subpartition has been released. */
        private volatile boolean isReleased;
     
    +   /** The number of non-event buffers currently in this subpartition */
    +   @GuardedBy("buffers")
    +   private volatile int buffersInBacklog;
    --- End diff --
    
    The way of  `ArrayDeque#size()` for `getBuffersInBacklog()` may be not 
feasible because we do not know how many events in the `ArrayDeque` and they 
should not be considered as backlog length.
    
    For the new API, we may need to modify the 
`ResultSubpartitionView#getNextBuffer` to return `BufferAndBacklog` wrapping 
structure instead of `Buffer`, and do we also need to extend the 
`BufferAndAvailability` to add backlog in it?  By this way, it can get benefits 
for `PipelinedSubpartition` to reduce 'volatile`, but for 
`SpillableSubpartition`, the `volatile` may still be needed? Because the 
`getNextBuffer` and `decreaseBacklog` are in different parts for 
`SpillableSubpartitionView/SpilledSubpartitionView`.



> Implement sender backlog logic for credit-based
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-7468
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7468
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Network
>            Reporter: zhijiang
>            Assignee: zhijiang
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> This is a part of work for credit-based network flow control.
> Receivers should know how many buffers are available on the sender side (the 
> backlog). The receivers use this information to decide how to distribute 
> floating buffers.
> The {{ResultSubpartition}} maintains the backlog which only indicates the 
> number of buffers in this subpartition, not including the number of events. 
> The backlog is increased for adding buffer to this subpartition, and 
> decreased for polling buffer from it.
> The backlog is attached in {{BufferResponse}} by sender as an absolute value 
> after the buffer being transferred.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to