Github user tzulitai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5171#discussion_r158164454
--- Diff:
flink-connectors/flink-connector-kinesis/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kinesis/util/AWSUtil.java
---
@@ -30,37 +30,44 @@
import com.amazonaws.auth.EnvironmentVariableCredentialsProvider;
import com.amazonaws.auth.SystemPropertiesCredentialsProvider;
import com.amazonaws.auth.profile.ProfileCredentialsProvider;
-import com.amazonaws.regions.Region;
+import com.amazonaws.client.builder.AwsClientBuilder;
import com.amazonaws.regions.Regions;
-import com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.AmazonKinesisClient;
+import com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.AmazonKinesis;
+import com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.AmazonKinesisClientBuilder;
import java.util.Properties;
/**
* Some utilities specific to Amazon Web Service.
*/
public class AWSUtil {
+ /** Used for formatting Flink-specific user agent string when creating
Kinesis client. */
+ private static final String USER_AGENT_FORMAT = "Apache Flink %s (%s)
Kinesis Connector";
/**
- * Creates an Amazon Kinesis Client.
+ * Creates an AmazonKinesis client.
* @param configProps configuration properties containing the access
key, secret key, and region
- * @return a new Amazon Kinesis Client
+ * @return a new AmazonKinesis client
*/
- public static AmazonKinesisClient createKinesisClient(Properties
configProps) {
+ public static AmazonKinesis createKinesisClient(Properties configProps)
{
// set a Flink-specific user agent
- ClientConfiguration awsClientConfig = new
ClientConfigurationFactory().getConfig();
- awsClientConfig.setUserAgent("Apache Flink " +
EnvironmentInformation.getVersion() +
- " (" +
EnvironmentInformation.getRevisionInformation().commitId + ") Kinesis
Connector");
+ ClientConfiguration awsClientConfig = new
ClientConfigurationFactory().getConfig()
+
.withUserAgentPrefix(String.format(USER_AGENT_FORMAT,
--- End diff --
To my understanding, switching from setUserAgent to withUserAgentPrefix
will result in different user agent strings, right?
Though I think internally the setUserAgent method is directly forwarding to
withUserAgentPrefix anyways ...
No objection on this, just curious.
---
