[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319865#comment-16319865
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8162:
---------------------------------------

Github user tzulitai commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5182#discussion_r160610484
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-connectors/flink-connector-kinesis/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kinesis/internals/KinesisDataFetcher.java
 ---
    @@ -542,6 +545,16 @@ public int 
registerNewSubscribedShardState(KinesisStreamShardState newSubscribed
                }
        }
     
    +   /**
    +    * Registers a metric group associated with the shard id of the 
provided {@link KinesisStreamShardState shardState}.
    +    */
    +   private MetricGroup buildMetricGroupForShard(KinesisStreamShardState 
shardState) {
    +           return runtimeContext
    +                   .getMetricGroup()
    +                   .addGroup("Kinesis")
    --- End diff --
    
    is this necessary?


> Kinesis Connector to report millisBehindLatest metric
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-8162
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8162
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Kinesis Connector
>            Reporter: Cristian
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: kinesis
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> When reading from Kinesis streams, one of the most valuable metrics is 
> "MillisBehindLatest" (see 
> https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-java/blob/25f0821f69bf94ec456f602f2b83ea2b0ca15643/aws-java-sdk-kinesis/src/main/java/com/amazonaws/services/kinesis/model/GetRecordsResult.java#L187-L201).
> Flink should use its metrics mechanism to report this value as a gauge, 
> tagging it with the shard id.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to