[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14609753#comment-14609753
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2297:
---------------------------------------
Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/874#discussion_r33658953
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/SVM.scala
---
@@ -187,6 +196,26 @@ class SVM extends Predictor[SVM] {
parameters.add(Seed, seed)
this
}
+
+ /** Sets the threshold above which elements are classified as positive
+ *
+ * @param threshold
+ * @return
+ */
+ def setThreshold(threshold: Double): SVM = {
+ parameters.add(Threshold, threshold)
+ this
+ }
+
+ /** Clears the classification threshold, predictions made after calling
this function will have
+ * the raw decision function value.
+ *
+ * @return
+ */
+ def clearThreshold(): SVM = {
+ parameters.add(Threshold, Option.empty[Double])
--- End diff --
It would be better if we have a `parameters.clear(Threshold)` method here.
> Add threshold setting for SVM binary predictions
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-2297
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2297
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Machine Learning Library
> Reporter: Theodore Vasiloudis
> Assignee: Theodore Vasiloudis
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: ML
> Fix For: 0.10
>
>
> Currently SVM outputs the raw decision function values when using the predict
> function.
> We should have instead the ability to set a threshold above which examples
> are labeled as positive (1.0) and below negative (-1.0). Then the prediction
> function can be directly used for evaluation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
