Github user NicoK commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4552#discussion_r161576253 --- Diff: flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/taskmanager/TaskCancelAsyncProducerConsumerITCase.java --- @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ public void testCancelAsyncProducerAndConsumer() throws Exception { config.setInteger(ConfigConstants.LOCAL_NUMBER_TASK_MANAGER, 1); config.setInteger(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NUM_TASK_SLOTS, 1); config.setInteger(TaskManagerOptions.MEMORY_SEGMENT_SIZE, 4096); - config.setInteger(TaskManagerOptions.NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS, 8); + config.setInteger(TaskManagerOptions.NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS, 16); --- End diff -- just a note for the curious: this test can cope with higher number of network buffers and is waiting for all of them to be blocked - increasing this to `9` would have been enough here though (we require 2 exclusive buffers now per default, while 1 was the minimum per incoming channel)
---