[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bowen Li updated FLINK-8189:
----------------------------
    Description: 
Move {{flink-statebackend-rocksdb}} into probably its own/state-backend module 
or {{flink-runtime}} package.

A few reasons:
* RocksDB state backend has been evolving into the standard state backends 
because it can handle much larger state compared to HeapStateBackend. It would 
be better to put it into /lib package in Flink somehow by default
* {{flink-contrib}} doesn't show the correct package hierarchy


  was:
Move {{flink-statebackend-rocksdb}} into probably its own/state-backend module 
or {{flink-runtime}} package.

A few reasons:
* RocksDB state backend has been evolving into the standard state backends 
because it can handle much larger state compared to HeapStateBackend. It would 
be better to put it into /lib package in Flink somehow by default
* {{flink-contrib}} doesn't show the correct package hierachy of 


> move flink-statebackend-rocksdb out of flink-contrib
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-8189
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8189
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Bowen Li
>            Assignee: Bowen Li
>            Priority: Major
>
> Move {{flink-statebackend-rocksdb}} into probably its own/state-backend 
> module or {{flink-runtime}} package.
> A few reasons:
> * RocksDB state backend has been evolving into the standard state backends 
> because it can handle much larger state compared to HeapStateBackend. It 
> would be better to put it into /lib package in Flink somehow by default
> * {{flink-contrib}} doesn't show the correct package hierarchy



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to