[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16340720#comment-16340720 ]
Till Rohrmann commented on FLINK-8189: -------------------------------------- Hi [~phoenixjiangnan], I agree with [~Zentol] that we should continue the discussion in FLINK-4602. There it was actually stated that it might be problematic to bundle RocksDB with {{flink-runtime}} because of licensing concerns. > move flink-statebackend-rocksdb out of flink-contrib > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FLINK-8189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8189 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: State Backends, Checkpointing > Affects Versions: 1.5.0 > Reporter: Bowen Li > Assignee: Bowen Li > Priority: Major > > Move {{flink-statebackend-rocksdb}} into probably its own/state-backend > module or {{flink-runtime}} package. > A few reasons: > * RocksDB state backend has been evolving into the standard state backends > because it can handle much larger state compared to HeapStateBackend. It > would be better to put it into /lib package in Flink somehow by default > * {{flink-contrib}} doesn't show the correct package hierarchy -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)