[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shimin Yang updated FLINK-9567:
-------------------------------
    Attachment: fulllog.txt

> Flink does not release resource in Yarn Cluster mode
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-9567
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9567
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Cluster Management, YARN
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Shimin Yang
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: FlinkYarnProblem, fulllog.txt
>
>
> After restart the Job Manager in Yarn Cluster mode, Flink does not release 
> task manager containers in some specific case.
> In the first log I posted, the container with id 24 is the reason why Yarn 
> did not release resources. Although the Task Manager in the container with id 
> 24 was released before restart. 
> But in line 347, 
> 2018-06-14 22:50:47,846 WARN akka.remote.ReliableDeliverySupervisor - 
> Association with remote system [akka.tcp://flink@bd-r1hdp69:30609] has 
> failed, address is now gated for [50] ms. Reason: [Disassociated] 
> this problem caused flink to request for one more container more than need. 
> As the excessive container return id determined by the 
> *numPendingContainerRequests* variable in *YarnResourceManager*, I think it's 
> the *onContainersCompleted* in *YarnResourceManager* called the method 
> *requestYarnContainer* which leads to the increase of 
> *numPendingContainerRequests.* However, the restart logic has already 
> allocated enough containers for Task Managers, Flink will possess the extra 
> container for a long time for nothing. In the worst case, I had a job 
> configured to 5 task managers, but possess more than 100 containers in the 
> end.
> ps: Another strange thing I found is that when sometimes request for a yarn 
> container, it will return much more than requested. Is it a normal scenario 
> for AMRMAsyncClient?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to