[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16532956#comment-16532956
]
Sihua Zhou commented on FLINK-9735:
-----------------------------------
Oh [~yuzhih...@gmail.com] you are right! The case in {{RocksDBResource}} should
be fixed, it didn't follow the OptionsFactory's java doc.
So the true issue here is not related to the code
{code:java}
if (optionsFactory != null) {
opt = optionsFactory.createDBOptions(opt);
}
{code}
in {{RocksDBStateBackend}}, but for the use case in {{RocksDBResource}}. Do you
mind if I change this ticket's description and title to the true issue.
> Potential resource leak in RocksDBStateBackend#getDbOptions
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-9735
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9735
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ted Yu
> Assignee: vinoyang
> Priority: Minor
>
> Here is related code:
> {code}
> if (optionsFactory != null) {
> opt = optionsFactory.createDBOptions(opt);
> }
> {code}
> opt, an DBOptions instance, should be closed before being rewritten.
> getColumnOptions has similar issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
