[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16548759#comment-16548759
 ] 

zhangminglei commented on FLINK-4534:
-------------------------------------

Hi, [~gjy] Can we use a lightweight synchronization mechanism to solve this ? 
For example, use {{volatile}} to void this issue.

> Lack of synchronization in BucketingSink#restoreState()
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-4534
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4534
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Streaming Connectors
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>            Assignee: zhangminglei
>            Priority: Major
>
> Iteration over state.bucketStates is protected by synchronization in other 
> methods, except for the following in restoreState():
> {code}
>     for (BucketState<T> bucketState : state.bucketStates.values()) {
> {code}
> and following in close():
> {code}
>     for (Map.Entry<String, BucketState<T>> entry : 
> state.bucketStates.entrySet()) {
>       closeCurrentPartFile(entry.getValue());
> {code}
> w.r.t. bucketState.pendingFilesPerCheckpoint , there is similar issue 
> starting line 752:
> {code}
>       Set<Long> pastCheckpointIds = 
> bucketState.pendingFilesPerCheckpoint.keySet();
>       LOG.debug("Moving pending files to final location on restore.");
>       for (Long pastCheckpointId : pastCheckpointIds) {
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to