[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16589873#comment-16589873
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9061:
---------------------------------------

StefanRRichter commented on a change in pull request #6604: [FLINK-9061] 
Optionally add entropy to checkpoint paths better S3 scalability
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6604#discussion_r212216578
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/state/filesystem/CheckpointPathFilter.java
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.runtime.state.filesystem;
+
+import org.apache.flink.core.fs.Path;
+
+/**
+ * A transformer that may modify paths for checkpoint data and metadata files.
+ */
+public interface CheckpointPathFilter {
 
 Review comment:
   `PathTransformer` might be a better name for what it does (see your own 
comment).
   
   I also wonder if we could simply collapse the separation path + transformer 
into a `PathProvider` or `PathFactory` and we could have one for data and one 
for meta data. This can be a bit tricky for `FsCheckpointStorageLocation`, but 
also the current solution seems problematic.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> add entropy to s3 path for better scalability
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-9061
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9061
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: FileSystem, State Backends, Checkpointing
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0, 1.4.2
>            Reporter: Jamie Grier
>            Assignee: Indrajit Roychoudhury
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> I think we need to modify the way we write checkpoints to S3 for high-scale 
> jobs (those with many total tasks).  The issue is that we are writing all the 
> checkpoint data under a common key prefix.  This is the worst case scenario 
> for S3 performance since the key is used as a partition key.
>  
> In the worst case checkpoints fail with a 500 status code coming back from S3 
> and an internal error type of TooBusyException.
>  
> One possible solution would be to add a hook in the Flink filesystem code 
> that allows me to "rewrite" paths.  For example say I have the checkpoint 
> directory set to:
>  
> s3://bucket/flink/checkpoints
>  
> I would hook that and rewrite that path to:
>  
> s3://bucket/[HASH]/flink/checkpoints, where HASH is the hash of the original 
> path
>  
> This would distribute the checkpoint write load around the S3 cluster evenly.
>  
> For reference: 
> https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/s3-bucket-performance-improve/
>  
> Any other people hit this issue?  Any other ideas for solutions?  This is a 
> pretty serious problem for people trying to checkpoint to S3.
>  
> -Jamie
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to