[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16651110#comment-16651110
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10356:
----------------------------------------
zhijiangW commented on issue #6705: [FLINK-10356][network] add sanity checks to
SpillingAdaptiveSpanningRecordDeserializer
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6705#issuecomment-430099420
@NicoK , thanks for this improvement and I think it is actually necessary to
add some checks during the deserialization, otherwise it is difficult to find
hidden problems or debug.
I reviewed the whole processes except the tests currently. I am only not
very understanding the usages of `getDeserializationError` in one place. Maybe
need your further explanation for clarification. :)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Add sanity checks to SpillingAdaptiveSpanningRecordDeserializer
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-10356
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10356
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Network
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0, 1.5.1, 1.5.2, 1.5.3, 1.6.0, 1.6.1, 1.7.0, 1.5.4
> Reporter: Nico Kruber
> Assignee: Nico Kruber
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> {{SpillingAdaptiveSpanningRecordDeserializer}} doesn't have any consistency
> checks for usage calls or serializers behaving properly, e.g. to read only as
> many bytes as available/promised for that record. At least these checks
> should be added:
> # Check that buffers have not been read from yet before adding them (this is
> an invariant {{SpillingAdaptiveSpanningRecordDeserializer}} works with and
> from what I can see, it is followed now.
> # Check that after deserialization, we actually consumed {{recordLength}}
> bytes
> ** If not, in the spanning deserializer, we currently simply skip the
> remaining bytes.
> ** But in the non-spanning deserializer, we currently continue from the
> wrong offset.
> # Protect against {{setNextBuffer}} being called before draining all
> available records
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
